Presentation Team Topic: ______ญญญญญญญญญ_______________________ Reviewer: _________________ Date: ___________
A. Overall Group Presentation |
35% |
|
The group was well
prepared. Each member contributed equally in the presentation. The
presentation seemed to be based on information collected from a variety of
appropriate sources/lessons that were solid and relevant to the
lesson/presentation. The lesson design
was creative and clearly built on an understanding of learning theory and
research on effective instructional practice.
They paced themselves appropriately during the presentation and
balanced time among and flow between team members effectively. The presentation and activities followed a
clear and logical sequence and support materials were effectively and
appropriately used. The lesson
presentation strategy was engaging and encouraged the active involvement of
the class. |
o
10 o
9 o
8 |
|
The group was fairly well
prepared. They had obviously collected and critiqued reference lessons
(although perhaps there could have been more/better quality lessons found and
used). The lesson design was based on
theories and research. They paced themselves appropriately during the
presentation and balanced time among and flow between team members
effectively. The presentation and
activities was sequential and support materials were appropriately used. The lesson presentation strategy actively
involved class members. |
o
7 o
6 o
5 o
4 |
|
The presentation was uneven
and it appeared that a few members had done most of the work. While they may
have shared information, it appeared from the presentation that most of the
preparation and presentation was dominated by one or two members of the team
and did not truly represent a group effort. The sources of information used
were simply lesson plans with little in the way of critique or referenced
support. The presentation consisted
primarily of reading from notes and did little to engage participants in any
meaningful way. |
o
3 o
2 o
1 |
|
The team obviously did not
prepare for this presentation as well as they should have. There was little
or no evidence of any critique of lessons gathered. All information referenced was available
from the assigned readings in the text and little, if any, outside reading
was evidenced. They did not engage the
class actively in their lesson and did little more than read in turn. |
o
0 |
B. Critique and Discussion |
20% |
|
The group was fully
prepared for the questions asked (during) after their presentation. They had
in-depth knowledge of the lessons reviewed and were able to clearly
articulate their strengths and weaknesses as well as the rationale for the
design of their team lesson based on this critique. Through facilitation of the discussion they
were able to demonstrate their extensive research base when answering
specific questions. The answers to the questions asked provided a means to
further illuminate the critique and helped the rest of the class to clearly
understand the strengths and theoretical and research basis of their lesson
as presented. |
o
10 o
9 o
8 |
|
The group was able to
answer some, but not all, of the questions completely. In their answers they displayed knowledge
of the lessons reviewed and were able to share information on their strengths
and weaknesses and describe how the design of the team lesson was based on
this critique. Through facilitation of
the discussion they were able to demonstrate their research base when
answering specific questions. The answers to the questions asked provided a
means to further illuminate the critique and helped the rest of the class to
understand the strengths and theoretical and research basis of the lesson as
presented. |
o
7 o
6 o
5 o
4 |
|
The information collected,
while sufficient to design and present their lesson, was insufficient to
handle the questions asked by their peers.
They were not sufficiently familiar with the lessons reviewed to
describe their strengths and weaknesses and were not able to clearly identify
how they designed their lesson based on this critique. Many of their answers consisted of
re-stating the points they made earlier. |
o
3 o
2 o
1 |
|
They were unable to
adequately answer many/most of the questions put to them. |
o
0 |
Comments: (use the reverse) Scoring Reference Key 0 = < 60% (D) 1-3 = 70-79% (C) 4-7 = 80 89% (B) 8-10 = 90-100% (A)